Type 1 – Conventional coatings produced from chromic acid bath Purpose: Delivers an electrically non-conductive surface with improved scratch and corrosion resistance. Primarily used in aerospace applications and on castings where components that may undergo flexing due to heat changes or mechanical means
Type 2 – Sulfuric acid anodizing, conventional coatings produced from sulfuric acid bath Purpose: Intended to improve surface corrosion protection under severe service conditions or as a base for paint systems
Type 2B – Thin sulfuric acid anodizing, for use as non-chromate alternative for Type 1 and 1B coatings Purpose: Non-chromate alternative to Type 1 and 1B coatings, where corrosion resistance, paint adhesion, and fatigue resistance are all required
Type 3 – Hard Anodic Coatings Purpose: Provide wear and abrasion resistant surfaces with improved corrosion protection due to greater thickness and weight than the conventional anodic coatings. Reminder: Sealing of Type 3 coatings is not recommended unless corrosion resistance is also a factor, as both wear resistance and fatigue strength can be reduced by sealing
Types of Anodic Coatings Available
Type 1B – Chromic acid anodizing, low voltage process
Type 1C – Non-chromic acid anodizing, for use as non-chromate alternative for Type 1 and 1B coating
Classes
Class 1 – Non-dyed
Class 2 – Dyed
Acquisition documents should specify the following
Assembly Anodizing – If an assembly is required, customer MUST provide AOTCO with this information.
Due to electrolyte entrapment, assembly anodize must be pre-approved by AOTCO on a PART TO PART basis
Type of anodic coating, title, number and date of this specification
Class of anodic coating
Special process operating conditions, if applicable
Special cleaning and fabrication requirements
Color and uniformity of Class 2 coatings, if applicable
Degree of non-uniformity of dyed casting alloys
Type 3 coating thickness, if applicable
Coating weight for thickness, (for Type 3) if substituted
Special sealing requirements
When applicable, the allowable difference in anodic coating appearance resulting from inherent base metal differences
Provide the specific location of contact marks if important to the function of the part
Acceptance criteria for quality conformance inspections
If paint adhesion testing is required for quality conformance testing and the required paint system
Minimum Thickness (typical) in inch of Anodic Coatings
Alloy Designation
Type 2 Thickness of Coating
Inches
Mils
1100
0.000093
0.093
2024-T4
0.000125
0.125
2024-T6
-
-
3003
0.000103
0.103
5052 .
0.000098
0.098
5056
-
-
6061-T6
0.000099
0.099
7075-T6
-
-
Alclad 2014-T6
-
-
Alclad 7075-T6
-
-
295-T6
0.000107
0.107
356-T6
0.000102
0.102
514
0.000086
0.086
Thickness Ranges of Anodic Coatings on Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys
Coating Type
Thickness Range
Inches
Mils
1, 1B, 1C, and 2B
0.00002 to 0.00007
.02-.07
2
0.00007 to 0.0010
.07-0.1
3
0.0005 to 0.0045
0.5-4.5
Coating Weight Relative to Type
Coating Type
Coating Weight (mg/ft2)
1 and 1B
200 min
1C
200 min - 700 max
2
1000 min
2B
200 min - 1000 max
Additional Relationships to Consider When Designing Part Coating
Fatigues properties of aluminum alloys can be severely reduced by anodic coatings. The amount of reduction varies with the process. As a rule of thumb, the thicker the coating the greater the fatigue will be
Hardcoat of 2 mils or more is extremely difficult to obtain on high silicon dye castings such as 360, 380, and 383
Abrasion resistance in Type 3 hardcoat will decrease as the thickness of coating approaches 3 mils. In general, abrasion resistance does NOT increase with coating thicknessired for quality conformance testing and the required paint system